如何自学 占星术 占星教程网盘 塔罗牌教程百度网盘

STATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR INTERFERENCES WITH THE FREEDOM OF NAVIGATION IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAWPDF电子书下载

外文

• 作 者：
• 出 版 社：SPRINGER
• 出版年份：2007
• ISBN：3540743324
• 页数：288 页

图书介绍： 查看图书目录点击购买PDF全本电子书 上一篇：INFORMATION SYSTEMS CONCEPTS FOR MANAGEMENT下一篇：BASIC MEDICAL TECHNIQUES AND PATIENT CARE IN IMAGING TECHNOLOGY FIFTH EDITION 《STATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR INTERFERENCES WITH THE FREEDOM OF NAVIGATION IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW》目录 标签：

Introduction1

Chapter Ⅰ：The perpetual conflict between freedom and security in the Law of the Sea5

A．The freedom of navigation-cornerstone of the Law of the Sea5

Ⅰ．Freedom of navigation-an instrument of common sense rather than a legal argument6

Ⅱ．Exclusive Flag State Jurisdiction-from an instrument to maintain maritime power to a key to liberalize maritime transport9

Ⅲ．Free navigation for worldwide economic growth and development12

B．Security concerns brought forward to interfere with navigation16

Ⅰ．Piracy-an ancient,but persistent business17

Ⅱ．Terrorism and weapons of mass destruction-the new dominant concern25

1．Scenarios of terrorist attacks on maritime trade26

2．Potential economic impact of terrorist attacks on maritime trade28

3．Preventive and repressive measures to combat maritime terrorism29

a）Ship and port security29

b）Interception operations32

Ⅲ．Undocumented Migration36

Ⅳ．Narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances39

Ⅴ．Illegal fishing44

Ⅳ．Pollution47

Ⅶ．Fading away and back-up grounds for interferences49

C．Legal limits for interferences and the role of State responsibility51

Chapter Ⅱ： Principles drawn from the treaty provisions on State responsibility for interferences with navigation on the high seas57

A．Treaty interpretation58

Ⅰ．Interpretation of the wording60

Ⅱ．Interpretation of the context61

Ⅲ．Object and purpose63

Ⅳ．A hierarchy of methods under Art.31 VCLT64

Ⅴ．Supplementary means of interpretation65

B．An individual right to claim compensation?67

Ⅰ．The ordinary meaning of the relevant provisions68

Ⅱ．Context70

1．The structure of the Law of the Sea Convention70

2．The conventions succeeding the Law of the Sea Convention71

3．Subsequent practice72

4．Rules of general international law75

5．Invocation of State responsibility by private entities in maritime matters79

6．The primary right affected by the interference84

a）Freedom of navigation:a right of the flag State or of the"ship"?84

b）The relevance of the right to property88

7．Conclusion91

8．Meaning of"the ship"91

Ⅲ．Object and purpose93

Ⅳ．Preparatory work94

1．The Law of the Sea Convention94

2．The Intervention Convention97

3．The Straddling Fish Stocks Agreement101

4．The Migrant Smuggling Protocol104

5．The 2005 Protocol to the SUA Convention106

Ⅴ．Conclusion111

C．The act entailing responsibility:requirement of wrongfulness?112

Ⅰ．Art.110,para.3 LOSC,the prototype of liability for lawful conduct in the Law of the Sea113

Ⅱ．Hot pursuit under Art.111,para.8 LOSC115

Ⅲ．The seizure of pirate ships under Art.106 LOSC116

Ⅳ．Interferences under the Intervention Convention118

Ⅴ．Liability for interfering with the navigation of fishing vessels under the Fish Stocks Agreement120

Ⅳ．Interferences in order to combat Migrant Smuggling120

Ⅶ．Terrorism interdiction operations under the 2005 SUA Protocol122

Ⅷ．The effect of the special nature of the compensation provisions123

IX．Conclusion125

D．Responsibility for attempted interferences126

E．The liable entity-particularly in situations of multilateral boardings127

Ⅰ．Bilateral boardings128

1．The few indications in the analyzed provisions128

2．The principles in the general law on State responsibility130

a）Attribution130

b）Participation132

（1）Aid and assistance133

（2）Direction and control133

（3）Vicarious liability for internationally lawful conduct?134

3．Joint and several liability?135

Ⅱ．Interdictions within the framework of International Organizations139

1．The scope of interferences involving International Organizations140

2．Responsibility of the international or regional organization?143

a）The United Nations144

b）Regional organizations enforcing embargoes on the seas146

c）Operation Enduring Freedom148

d）Conclusion149

3．Responsibility of member States for wrongful acts by an International Organization149

4．The applicability of the compensation provisions to International Organizations153

5．Conclusion156

F．The effect of conduct by the boarded party156

Ⅰ．Clean Hands Doctrine156

Ⅱ．The limited reception of the doctrine in international maritime conventions161

Ⅲ．Contributory negligence in the general law on State responsibility162

Ⅳ．Contributory negligence in cases codified by maritime conventions164

G．Consensual boardings165

H．The extent of responsibility170

Ⅰ．A comparison of the different provisions170

1．The link between the conduct by the responsible State and the damage170

2．Qualification of the damage173

a）"Any loss or damage"173

b）"Any damage,harm or loss"175

Ⅱ．The provisions and the general law on State responsibility176

Ⅲ．Types of damages which may be claimed and their calculation179

1．Delay of the vessel179

2．Expected profits182

3．Value of the vessel and cargo184

4．Detention and mistreatment of the crew186

5．Punitive damages189

6．Interest192

a）Starting date193

b）When does the interest stop to run?195

c）The interest rate195

7．Currency of the compensation196

8．Damage to the flag state197

9．Costs and expenses198

10．The ability of the respondent State to compensate199

Ⅳ．The Intervention Convention:distinction between disproportionate and proportionate damages?200

J．Some procedural issues203

Ⅰ．The onus of proof203

Ⅱ．Competing claims of protection207

Ⅲ．An obligation to forward the compensation award to the victim?210

Chapter Ⅲ：The U.S.strategy:28 bilateral treaties and the Proliferation Security Initiative215

A．The 1924 Liquor Treaties216

B．The 1981 Exchange of Notes217

C．Bilateral anti-drugs and migration agreements219

Ⅰ．Shipboarding222

Ⅱ．Shipriders223

Ⅲ．Entry-to-investigate and pursuit224

Ⅳ．Conclusion225

D．Liability under the loose framework of the Proliferation Security Initiative.225

E．Ship Boarding Agreements within the framework of the Proliferation Security Initiative227

F．United States law on State Liability229

Chapter Ⅳ：Compensation for interferences in international conflicts233

A．The law of naval warfare233

Ⅰ．Three views concerning the legality of visit and search of neutral vessels in times of war234

Ⅱ．Compensation under the traditional law of naval warfare236

Ⅲ．Liability under the San Remo Manual241

Ⅳ．The restrictive view and its consequences for State responsibility242

Ⅴ．The development of the damages covered in the law on State responsibility and its consequences for the law of naval warfare242

Ⅳ．Conclusion244

B．Interdictions authorized by the United Nations Security Council244

Chapter Ⅴ：Conclusions and outlook249

A．Major conclusions249

B．Outlook to the future of the liability regime concerning interferences with navigation on the high seas251

Annex 1：Relevant compensation provisions253

Annex 2：Bibliography255

Annex 3：Table of cases279

相关图书

作者其它书籍

出版社其它书籍

本类热门

• 1PERIODICAL TITLE ABBREVIATIONS
• 2LEWIN’S GENES XII
• 3Mansfield Park（1814）
• 4CREDIT MODELS AND CRISIS
• 5Pride And Drejudice（1812）
• 6Sense And Sensibility（1811）
• 7HANDBOOK OF BUSINESS FORMULAS AND CONTROLS
• 8Emma（1815）
• 9Northanger Abbey（1818）
• 10HUMANITIES THE EVOLUTION OF VALUES

摘要：本文以《STATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR INTERFERENCES WITH THE FREEDOM OF NAVIGATION IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW.pdf电子书版文档下载》为中心，从国际法视角出发，详细探讨了国家对于干涉公海航行自由的责任。文章首先概述了公海航行自由的重要性，接着从四个方面对国家责任进行了深入分析，最后总结了国家责任在维护国际海洋秩序中的重要作用。

1、公海航行自由的重要性

公海航行自由是国际海洋法的基本原则之一，它保障了各国船舶在公海上的自由航行权。公海航行自由对于国际贸易、海上运输、海洋资源开发等方面具有重要意义。然而，随着国际形势的变化，一些国家开始干涉公海航行自由，这对国际海洋秩序构成了严重威胁。

首先，公海航行自由是国际海洋法的基本原则，各国应当尊重和遵守。其次，公海航行自由有助于促进国际贸易和海上运输的发展，提高各国经济实力。最后，公海航行自由有助于海洋资源的合理开发和利用，保障各国人民的福祉。

因此，国家对于干涉公海航行自由的行为负有责任，应当采取措施维护公海航行自由的国际秩序。

2、国家责任的界定

国家责任是指国家在国际法上对其违反国际义务的行为所承担的责任。在公海航行自由领域，国家责任主要包括以下三个方面：

一是国家不得采取任何形式干涉他国船舶在公海上的航行自由；二是国家应当采取措施防止其领土、领海、专属经济区等海域内的行为对公海航行自由造成影响；三是国家应当承担因违反国际义务而给其他国家造成的损失。

国家责任的界定有助于明确各国在公海航行自由领域的权利和义务，为维护国际海洋秩序提供法律依据。

3、国家责任的承担方式

国家责任的承担方式主要包括以下几种：

一是赔偿损失，即国家因违反国际义务而给其他国家造成的损失，应当承担相应的赔偿责任；二是恢复原状，即国家应当采取措施恢复因违反国际义务而造成的损害；三是道歉，即国家应当向受损害的国家表示歉意；四是履行国际义务，即国家应当履行其国际义务，以消除违反国际义务的行为。

国家责任的承担方式有助于维护国际海洋秩序，促进各国之间的友好合作。

4、国家责任在维护国际海洋秩序中的作用

国家责任在维护国际海洋秩序中具有重要作用。首先，国家责任有助于遏制干涉公海航行自由的行为，维护国际海洋秩序的稳定；其次，国家责任有助于促进各国之间的友好合作，共同维护国际海洋秩序；最后，国家责任有助于推动国际海洋法的发展，为国际海洋秩序提供更加完善的法律保障。

因此，国家责任在维护国际海洋秩序中具有重要意义。

总结：

本文从公海航行自由的重要性、国家责任的界定、国家责任的承担方式以及国家责任在维护国际海洋秩序中的作用四个方面对《STATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR INTERFERENCES WITH THE FREEDOM OF NAVIGATION IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW.pdf电子书版文档下载》进行了详细阐述。通过分析，本文认为国家责任在维护国际海洋秩序中具有重要作用，各国应当共同努力，维护公海航行自由的国际秩序。

本文由nayona.cn整理

点击联系需要东西方神秘学学习资料，专业的咨询