如何自学 占星术 占星教程网盘 塔罗牌教程百度网盘

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL MARITIME CONVENTIONSPDF电子书下载

外文

• 作 者：
• 出 版 社：ROUTLEDGE TALOR & FRANCIS GROUP
• 出版年份：2011
• ISBN：0415601405
• 页数：412 页

图书介绍： 查看图书目录点击购买PDF全本电子书 上一篇：GLOBAL WARMING THE GREENPEACE REPORT下一篇：THE DISCOVERERY OF TOURISM ECONOMICS VOLUM 16 《LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL MARITIME CONVENTIONS》目录 标签：

Introduction1

Ⅰ.The concept of limitation of liability1

Ⅱ.The international nature of the concept and the need for a comprehensive approach2

Ⅲ.Methodology and contents3

1 Historical background5

1.1 Origins of the concept and its development in continental Europe5

1.2 English Law and limitation of liability8

1.2.1 Limitation of liability and the action in rem8

1.2.2 Statutory regulation of limitation of liability10

1.3 Different systems of limitation of liability15

1.3.1 Limitation by reference to tonnage15

1.3.2 Limitation by residual value15

1.3.2.1 Limitation by abandonment15

1.3.2.2 Limitation by execution16

1.3.3 Option systems16

1.3.3.1 The American system16

1.3.3.2 The Belgian system17

1.4 International regulation of limitation of liability17

1.4.1 The 1924 Convention18

1.4.2 The 1957 Convention19

2 The LLMC Convention22

2.1 Persons entitled to limit liability23

2.1.1 Shipowners23

2.1.1.1 Charterers25

2.1.1.2 Managers and operators31

2.1.2 Salvors32

2.1.3 Any person for whose act the shipowner or salvor is responsible33

2.1.4 Liability insurers35

2.2 Ships in respect of which liability can be limited35

2.2.1 Ships36

2.2.2 Seagoing ships37

2.2.3 Craft excluded by the Convention39

2.3 Claims subject to limitation40

2.3.1 Claims in respect of loss of life or personal injury or loss of or damage to property41

2.3.2 Claims resulting from delay43

2.3.3 Claims for infringement of rights44

2.3.4 Claims for wreck and cargo removal45

2.3.5 Claims in respect of measures taken in order to avert or minimize loss46

2.4 Claims excepted from limitation47

2.4.1 Salvage and general average47

2.4.2 Oil pollution claims48

2.4.3 Nuclear claims49

2.4.4 Claims by servants of the shipowner and salvor50

2.4.5 Other excluded claims51

2.4.5.1 Exclusions by interpretation51

2.5 Loss of right to limit54

2.5.1 Conduct barring limitation under the 1957 Convention54

2.5.1.1 What is actual fault or privity?54

2.5.1.2 Whose fault or privity?57

2.5.1.3 The move away from actual fault or privity61

2.5.2 Conduct barring limitation under the LLMC Convention62

2.5.2.1 Whose personal act or omission?63

2.5.2.2 Intent64

2.5.2.3 Recklessness64

2.5.2.4 With knowledge65

2.5.2.5 Loss68

2.5.2.6 Such loss68

2.5.2.7 The burden of proof69

2.5.3 The impact of the ISM Code on the conduct barring limitation69

2.5.4 Is the right to limit really unbreakable?73

2.6 The general limits of liability76

2.6.1 Which tonnage?76

2.6.1.1 Tug and tow situations76

2.6.1.2 Salvors78

2.6.2 The limitation amounts79

2.6.2.1 The overspill provision80

2.6.2.2 Claims in respect of damage to harbour works,basins and waterways and aids to navigation83

2.6.2.3 The unit of account84

2.7 Limitation of liability for passenger claims85

2.7.1 Was a separate fund necessary?85

2.7.2 Per capita limit,global limit,or both?86

2.7.3 Minimum or maximum limit?86

2.7.4 ‘Authorized to carry’ or ‘actually carried’?87

2.7.5 Amount of the limit?88

2.7.6 The adopted text89

2.8 Reservations91

2.8.1 Is a reservation based on the wording of Article 18 an effective reservation?95

2.8.2 Does an effective reservation also exclude recourse actions?99

3 The 1996 Protocol103

3.1 Persons entitled to limit liability103

3.2 Claims excepted from limitation104

3.2.1 Automatic exclusions104

3.2.2 Optional exclusions105

3.3 The new limits of liability106

3.3.1 The general limits106

3.3.2 The limit of liability for passenger claims108

3.3.3 Amendment of limits110

3.3.3.1 First proposal to amend the limits of liability under Article 8 of the 1996 Protocol110

4 Conventions relating to the carriage of passengers and their luggage by sea113

4.1 First attempts at international regulation115

4.1.1 The 1961 Convention115

4.1.2 The 1967 Convention116

4.2 The Athens Convention and the 1976 Athens Protocol116

4.2.1 Persons entitled to limit liability117

4.2.2 Basis of liability118

4.2.2.1 Liability of the carrier118

4.2.2.2 Liability for servants or agents119

4.2.2.3 Liability of the performing carrier120

4.2.2.4 Liability for valuables121

4.2.2.5 Contributory fault122

4.2.2.6 Burden of proof122

4.2.2.7 Basis for claims123

4.2.3 The limits of liability123

4.2.3.1 Death or personal injuries124

4.2.3.2 Loss of or damage to luggage124

4.2.3.3 Supplementary provisions125

4.2.3.4 The monetary unit126

4.2.4 Loss of right to limit126

4.2.5 Other conventions on limitation of liability128

4.3 The 1990 Protocol128

4.4 The 2002 Protocol129

4.4.1 Basis of liability130

4.4.1.1 Liability of the carrier130

4.4.1.2 Burden of proof133

4.4.2 Compulsory insurance134

4.4.2.1 The amount of compulsory insurance cover135

4.4.2.2 The compulsory insurance certificate136

4.4.2.3 The right of direct action138

4.4.3 The new limits of liability138

4.4.3.1 Death or personal injuries138

4.4.3.2 Loss of or damage to luggage139

4.4.3.3 The unit of account and conversion140

4.5 IMO Reservation and Guidelines for the Implementation of the Athens Convention 2002140

4.5.1 The Reservation141

4.5.2 The Guidelines142

4.5.3 Relationship between the IMO Reservation and Guidelines and the Athens Convention 2002142

5 Conventions relating to liability and compensation for pollution damage145

5.1 The 1969 CLC and the 1992 CLC145

5.1.1 Scope of application146

5.1.1.1 Application to sea-going vessels146

5.1.1.2 Types of loss covered147

5.1.1.3 Territorial application148

5.1.2 Liability of the shipowner148

5.1.3 Channelling of liability150

5.1.4 Limitation of liability150

5.1.5 Compulsory insurance151

5.1.6 The right of direct action151

5.1.7 Difference between the 1969 CLC and the 1992 CLC151

5.2 The HNS Convention152

5.2.1 Damage covered154

5.2.2 Limitation of liability154

5.2.3 The 2010 HNS Protocol155

5.2.3.1 Limits of liability155

5.2.3.2 A single international HNS regime157

5.2.3.3 Entry into force158

5.3 The Bunkers Convention158

5.3.1 Scope of application159

5.3.1.1 Territorial application159

5.3.1.2 Types of loss covered159

5.3.1.3 Exclusions162

5.3.2 Persons liable162

5.3.2.1 Responder immunity163

5.3.3 Basis of liability164

5.3.4 Limitation of liability165

5.3.5 Compulsory insurance166

6 The Nairobi Convention167

6.1 Wrecks covered by the Convention169

6.1.1 Wreck169

6.1.2 Hazard170

6.1.3 Convention area170

6.2 Liability of the owner171

6.2.1 Standard of liability172

6.2.2 Burden of proof173

6.2.3 Basis for claims173

6.3 Limitation of liability173

6.4 Compulsory insurance174

6.4.1 The amount of compulsory insurance cover174

6.5 Entry into force175

7 Relationship between global limitation conventions and particular liability regimes176

7.1 Global limitation conventions and the conventions relating to carriage of assengers and their luggage by sea176

7.1.1 Relationship between the LLMC Convention and the Athens Convention176

7.1.2 Relationship between the 1996 Protocol and the Athens Convention179

7.1.3 Relationship between the LLMC Convention as amended by the 1996 Protocol and Athens Convention 2002 as implemented through the IMO Reservation and Guidelines180

7.2 Global limitation conventions and the conventions relating to liability and compensation for pollution damage184

7.2.1 Relationship between the LLMC Convention as amended by the 1996 Protocol and the 1969 CLC as amended by the 1992 CLC185

7.2.2 Relationship between the LLMC Convention as amended by the 1996 Protocol and the HNS Convention as amended by the 2010 HNS Protocol188

7.2.3 Relationship between the LLMC Convention as amended by the 1996 Protocol and the Bunkers Convention190

7.2.3.1 Bunker oil pollution claims under the LLMC Convention191

7.2.3.2 Linkage between the Bunkers Convention and the LLMC Convention195

7.3 Global limitation conventions and the Nairobi Convention197

7.3.1 No reservations198

7.3.2 Reservations in respect of Article 2(1)(d) and (e)198

7.3.3 Reservations in respect of Article 2(1)(d)199

7.3.4 Reservations plus national law199

8 The way forward201

8.1 Proposed amendments to the LLMC Convention202

8.1.1 Definitions202

8.1.2 Persons entitled to limit liability202

8.1.2.1 Charterers203

8.1.2.2 Managers and operators204

8.1.3 Other persons to whom the right to limit may be extended205

8.1.3.1 The carrier of passengers205

8.1.3.2 Harbour,conservancy,dock and canal authorities207

8.1.3.3 Classification societies208

8.1.4 Claims subject to limitation210

8.1.4.1 Wreck and cargo removal claims210

8.1.4.2 Bunker oil pollution claims212

8.1.5 Claims excepted from limitation213

8.1.5.1 Claims for oil pollution213

8.1.5.2 Claims for legal costs214

8.1.6 The limits of liability214

8.1.6.1 The limitation amounts214

8.1.6.2 Tug and tow situations215

8.1.6.3 The overspill provision215

8.1.6.4 Slot charterers215

8.1.7 Passenger claims216

8.1.8 Reservations217

8.1.9 A single international LLMC regime218

8.2 Draft amendments219

APPENDICES227

1.Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims,1976229

2.Protocol of 1996 to amend the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims,1976242

3.Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea,1974249

4.Protocol of 2002 to the Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea,1974260

5.IMO Reservation and Guidelines for Implementation of the Athens Convention279

6.International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage,1969289

7.Protocol of 1992 to amend the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage,1969300

8.International Convention on Liability and Compensation for Damage in Connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea,1996314

9.Protocol of 2010 to the International Convention on Liability and Compensation for Damage in Connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea,1996354

10.International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage,2001370

11.Nairobi International Convention on the Removal of Wrecks,2007384

Selected bibliography401

Index409

相关图书

作者其它书籍

出版社其它书籍

• 《C++ AMP 用Visual C++加速大规模并行计算》（美）格雷戈里，（美）米勒着 2014
• 《税法》财政部注册会计师全国考试委员会办公室编 1996
• 《应用英语教程》宋宜贞主编 2009
• 《中国近代文学大系 1840-1919 第4集 第14卷 诗词集 1》钱仲联主编 1991
• 《中国近代文学大系 1840-1919 第3集 第11卷 散文集 2》任访秋主编 1992
• 《毛泽东传 1893-1949 上》中共中央文献研究室编；主编；金冲及 1996
• 《Visual Basic程序员的Java开发指南 用于Windows 95 & Windows NT》（美）（J.W.库珀）James W.Cooper着；于冬梅，宋勇译 1998
• 《外国汽车电子点火系统维修》中国机动车辆安全鉴定检测中心编译 1998
• 《动漫幻想未来世界概念设计》（美）蔡逸南着 2011
• 《金银岛 化身博士》（英）斯蒂文生着；章云义译 1998

本类热门

• 1PERIODICAL TITLE ABBREVIATIONS
• 2LEWIN’S GENES XII
• 3Mansfield Park（1814）
• 4CREDIT MODELS AND CRISIS
• 5Pride And Drejudice（1812）
• 6Sense And Sensibility（1811）
• 7HANDBOOK OF BUSINESS FORMULAS AND CONTROLS
• 8Emma（1815）
• 9Northanger Abbey（1818）
• 10HUMANITIES THE EVOLUTION OF VALUES

摘要：本文以“LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL MARITIME CONVENTIONS.pdf电子书版文档下载”为中心，详细阐述了国际海事公约中责任限制的相关内容。通过对公约的深入分析，本文从责任限制的背景、适用范围、实施方式和法律效力四个方面进行了全面探讨，旨在为我国海事法律研究和实践提供有益参考。

1、背景

随着全球贸易的不断发展，国际海事活动日益频繁。然而，海事事故也时有发生，给船舶所有人、承运人等带来了巨大的经济损失。为了平衡各方利益，国际海事组织（IMO）于1976年通过了《1976年海事赔偿责任限制公约》（以下简称“1976年公约”），旨在规范海事赔偿责任限制制度。此后，各国纷纷加入公约，形成了较为完善的海事赔偿责任限制体系。

然而，随着国际海事活动的不断深入，1976年公约在适用范围、责任限制额度等方面存在一定的局限性。为了解决这些问题，国际海事组织于1996年通过了《1996年海事赔偿责任限制公约》（以下简称“1996年公约”），对1976年公约进行了修订和完善。

“LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL MARITIME CONVENTIONS.pdf电子书版文档下载”正是基于1996年公约制定的电子书，旨在为我国海事法律研究和实践提供参考。

2、适用范围

1996年公约明确了责任限制的适用范围，包括船舶所有人、承运人、船舶经营人、船舶承租人等。这些主体在发生海事事故时，可以根据公约规定，对赔偿责任进行限制。

公约规定，责任限制适用于因船舶所有人的疏忽、过失或故意行为导致的损失。同时，公约还规定了责任限制的例外情况，如船舶所有人的故意行为、船舶所有人的责任保险等。

“LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL MARITIME CONVENTIONS.pdf电子书版文档下载”详细介绍了公约中责任限制的适用范围，为我国海事法律研究和实践提供了重要依据。

3、实施方式

1996年公约规定了责任限制的实施方式，包括责任限制基金的设立、责任限制额度的确定等。这些规定旨在确保责任限制制度的有效实施。

公约规定，责任限制基金由船舶所有人、承运人等共同设立，用于支付因海事事故导致的损失。责任限制额度根据船舶的类型、吨位等因素确定。

“LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL MARITIME CONVENTIONS.pdf电子书版文档下载”详细阐述了公约中责任限制的实施方式，为我国海事法律研究和实践提供了有益参考。

4、法律效力

1996年公约具有国际法律效力，各国在加入公约后，必须遵守公约规定。公约规定了责任限制的法律效力，包括责任限制的优先权、责任限制的执行等。

公约规定，责任限制具有优先权，即在船舶所有人、承运人等承担责任时，责任限制优先于其他债权。同时，公约还规定了责任限制的执行程序，确保责任限制制度的有效实施。

“LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL MARITIME CONVENTIONS.pdf电子书版文档下载”详细介绍了公约中责任限制的法律效力，为我国海事法律研究和实践提供了重要参考。

总结：

本文通过对“LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL MARITIME CONVENTIONS.pdf电子书版文档下载”的深入分析，从责任限制的背景、适用范围、实施方式和法律效力四个方面进行了全面探讨。这为我国海事法律研究和实践提供了有益参考，有助于完善我国海事赔偿责任限制制度。

本文的研究成果对于我国海事法律实践具有重要的指导意义，有助于提高我国在国际海事领域的竞争力。

本文由nayona.cn整理

点击联系需要东西方神秘学学习资料，专业的咨询