International law and the movement of persons between states.pdf电子书版文档下载

如何自学 占星术 占星教程网盘 塔罗牌教程百度网盘

International law and the movement of persons between states

International law and the movement of persons between statesPDF电子书下载

外文

  • 作 者:
  • 出 版 社:撰者
  • 出版年份:1978
  • ISBN:0198253338
  • 页数:324 页

图书介绍: 查看图书目录点击购买PDF全本电子书 上一篇:Le vicomte de bragelonne : Tome 4下一篇:PHARMAZEUTISCHE CHEMIE:LEHRBUCH FUR PHARMAZIE-INGENIEURE 《International law and the movement of persons between states》目录 标签:

PART Ⅰ:PRELIMINARY MATTERS3

Ⅰ.INTRODUCTION3

(1) General Principles limiting the Competence of States in Matters of Nationality4

(a) The Imposition of Nationality upon Immigrants or Residents6

(b) ‘Denationalization’7

(c) Nationality and Diplomatic Protection8

(2) Nationality and Rights of Entry in Municipal Law11

(a) British Nationality and Citizenship of the United Kingdom and Colonies11

(b) French Nationality14

(c) Nationality of the Federal Republic of Germany16

(d) Conclusions20

(3) State Powers in Relation to the Entry and Expulsion of Foreign Nationals21

(a) Bilateral Obligations21

(b) Obligations having a Regional or Multilateral Basis22

(c) Universal Obligations,or Obligations owed erga omnes22

Ⅱ.INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE PASSPORT REGIME24

(1) Possession of a Passport as a Condition of Admission25

(2) Passports and the ‘Right to Travel’29

(3) Liberalization of inter-State Travel:Alternative Travel Documents39

(a) Travel and Identity Documents for Refugees and Stateless Persons42

(4) The International Law of Passports44

(a) Passports and ‘Returnability’44

(b) The Passport as Evidence of Nationality46

(c) Conclusions49

Ⅲ.THE RELATION OF MATTERS OF IMMIGRATION TO THE RESERVED DOMAIN OF DOMESTIC JURISDICTION51

Ⅳ.THE IMPRESSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS STANDARDS ON THE TREATMENT OF FOREIGN NATIONALS58

(1) International Minimum Standard or National Treatment58

(2) Proposals for a ‘Standard of Humanity’63

(3) The 1966 Conventions66

(4) Human Rights Standards and General International Law71

Ⅴ.THE PRINCIPLE OF NON-DISCRIMINATION AND ITS APPLICATION TO FOREIGN NATIONALS75

(1) The Meaning of Discrimination75

(a) Non-Discrimination in the Jurisprudence of International Tribunals76

(b) Non-Discrimination as required by the European Convention on Human Rights79

(2) Discrimination on the Basis of Nationality83

PART Ⅱ:THE ENTRY AND EXCLUSION OF FOREIGN NATIONALS91

Introduction91

Ⅵ.ENTRY AND EXCLUSION UNDER THE LAW OF THE UNITED KINGDOM97

(1) History of Control over Aliens and Commonwealth Citizens97

(2) The Immigration Act 1971103

(a) Pre-entry Procedures106

(b) Procedure on Arrival108

(c) General Grounds for Exclusion116

(d) Rights of Appeal118

Ⅶ.ENTRY AND EXCLUSION UNDER THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA123

(1) The Immigration and Nationality Act 1952,as amended124

(a) Pre-entry Procedures128

(Ⅰ) Immigrants128

(Ⅱ) Non-immigrants129

(b) Procedure on Arrival130

(c) Rights of Appeal132

(d) Conclusions134

Ⅷ.OBLIGATIONS TO GRANT ADMISSION IMPOSED BY GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW136

(1) Nationals136

(2) Refugees and Asylum137

(a) ‘Asylum’ and ‘political offence’142

Ⅸ.OBLIGATIONS TO GRANT ADMISSION TO CERTAIN OTHER EXCEPTIONAL CATEGORIES147

(1) Diplomats and Consuls147

(2) Special Missions151

(3) International Officials152

(4) Crewmembers156

Ⅹ.OBLIGATIONS TO GRANT ADMISSION ARISING FROM TREATY160

(1) The European Convention on Human Rights161

(2) The European Convention on Establishment 1955 and the Treaty of Rome 1957168

(a) ‘Nationals’ of Member States173

(b) Rights incidental to free movement176

(c) Freedom of Establishment179

(d) Secondary Community Legislation181

(3) Bilateral Treaties of Establishment186

(4) Conclusions195

PART Ⅲ:EXPULSION201

Introduction201

The Traditional View of the Power of Expulsion203

Ⅺ.THE FUNCTION OF EXPULSION IN GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW206

(1) Introduction206

(a) First examples206

(b) First propositions208

(2) Expulsion and the Doctrine of Abuse of Rights209

(a) The Doctrine before International Tribunals210

(b) The Uganda Expulsions 1972212

(c) ‘Confiscatory expulsion’216

(d) Expulsion for other ulterior motives217

(3) Expulsion to a Particular State as the Breach of an International Obligation218

(a) ‘Locus standi’ under the European Convention on Human Rights221

(b) The Practice of ‘Disguised Extradition’223

(c) Municipal Law Controls224

(d) The Soblen Case226

(4) Conclusions Relating to the Function of Expulsion228

Ⅻ.THE JUSTIFICATION FOR EXPULSION229

(1) The Concept of ‘ordre public’229

(a) The Requirement of ‘reasonable cause’231

(b) The South African Expulsions 1900233

(2) Grounds for Expulsion in Municipal Law236

(a) United States Practice237

(b) United Kingdom Practice243

(c) Other Regimes251

(d) Grounds for Expulsion summarized255

(3) Expulsion and Respect for ‘Acquired Rights’255

(a) The Meaning of ‘Acquired Rights’256

(b) A Vested Right of Residence?259

(4) Conclusions Relating to the Justification for Expulsion262

ⅩⅢ.THE MANNER AND FORM OF EXPULSION263

(1) The Right to a Hearing263

(a) Judicial Review265

(2) Rights of Appeal in Municipal Law266

(a) United States Practice266

(b) United Kingdom Practice269

(c) A Hearing as an International Obligation274

(3) Personal Treatment of the Alien:Decisions of Tribunals275

(4) Compensation for Expulsion278

(5) Conclusions Relating to the Manner and Form of Expulsion280

ⅩⅣ.THE IMPRESSION OF TREATY OBLIGATIONS UPON THE GENERAL POWER OF EXPULSION282

(1) Introduction282

(2) Expulsion and the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms284

(a) The Fourth Protocol286

(b) The Example of Emergency Measures taken under Article 15290

(c) Procedural Guarantees for Aliens291

(d) Conclusions regarding the European Convention291

(3) Expulsion and Treaties of Establishment292

(a) Reserved Powers in Treaties of Establishment293

(b) ‘Ordre public’ reconsidered295

(c) ‘Ordre public’ and the Guardianship of Infants Case295

(d) ‘Ordre public’ in the Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany298

(4) Expulsion and the European Economic Community299

(a) The Scope of Reserved Powers under the Treaty of Rome300

(b) The Decision in Reyners v.Belgian State302

(c) The Decision in Van Duyn v.Home Office302

(d) Conclusions regarding the E.E.C.regime304

ⅩⅤ.A SUMMARY OF THE LIMITS ON THE POWER OF EXPULSION IN GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW307

Select Bibliography311

Index319

相关图书

    作者其它书籍

      出版社其它书籍

      • 《武林古板画 下》周亮编着 2013
      • 《唐代墓志义例研究》杨向奎编 2013
      • 《武林古板画 上》周亮编着 2013
      • 《醒世恒言》(明)冯梦龙着 2013
      • 《竞争战略 全译珍藏版》(美)迈克尔·波特(Michael E. Porter)着 2012
      • 《伤寒方历代治案》金明渊纂;金立伦,金能革,金能人整理 2013
      • 《中国古典文学名着名篇 喻世明言》(明)冯梦龙编 2011
      • 《宋刊周易本义》(宋)朱熹撰;姜燕点校 2014
      • 《中国古典小说普及文库 醒世恒言》(明)冯梦龙编着 2012
      • 《护身秘笈 青少年法律知识图文解读 学校篇》范燕宇,张鑫主编 2014

      本类热门

      • 1PERIODICAL TITLE ABBREVIATIONS
      • 2LEWIN’S GENES XII
      • 3Mansfield Park(1814)
      • 4CREDIT MODELS AND CRISIS
      • 5Pride And Drejudice(1812)
      • 6Sense And Sensibility(1811)
      • 7HANDBOOK OF BUSINESS FORMULAS AND CONTROLS
      • 8Emma(1815)
      • 9Northanger Abbey(1818)
      • 10HUMANITIES THE EVOLUTION OF VALUES

      摘要:本文以《International law and the movement of persons between states.pdf电子书版文档下载》为研究对象,从国际法视角出发,详细探讨了国家间人员流动的法律问题。文章首先概述了国际法在人员流动中的基本原则,接着从国际法对人员流动的规范、国际法在人员流动中的实施以及国际法在人员流动中的争议解决等方面进行了深入分析,最后总结了国际法在人员流动中的重要作用。

      1、国际法的基本原则

      国际法在人员流动中遵循的基本原则包括国家主权原则、非歧视原则和人权原则。国家主权原则强调国家对其领土和公民的管辖权,非歧视原则要求国家在处理人员流动问题时不得歧视任何个人或群体,人权原则则要求国家尊重和保护个人的人权。

      国家主权原则是国际法的基本原则之一,它要求国家在处理人员流动问题时,必须尊重其他国家的领土完整和主权。这意味着国家在制定和实施人员流动政策时,不能侵犯其他国家的领土和主权。

      非歧视原则要求国家在处理人员流动问题时,不得基于种族、性别、宗教、国籍等因素对个人或群体进行歧视。这一原则旨在确保所有个人和群体在人员流动中享有平等的权利和机会。

      人权原则要求国家在处理人员流动问题时,必须尊重和保护个人的人权。这包括生命权、自由权、平等权、财产权等基本人权。国家在制定和实施人员流动政策时,应当充分考虑人权因素,确保个人的人权得到充分保障。

      2、国际法对人员流动的规范

      国际法对人员流动的规范主要体现在国际条约和习惯法中。这些规范旨在规范国家间的人员流动,保障个人和群体的合法权益。以下是一些重要的国际法规范:

      《联合国宪章》规定,各国应尊重人权和基本自由,不得对任何个人或群体进行歧视。《联合国宪章》是国际法的基本文件,对各国处理人员流动问题具有普遍约束力。

      《世界人权宣言》规定了个人和群体享有的基本人权,包括迁徙自由权。这一宣言对各国处理人员流动问题具有重要的指导意义。

      《国际人权法》是一系列国际条约的总称,包括《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》、《经济、社会和文化权利国际公约》等。这些公约对各国处理人员流动问题提供了具体规范。

      3、国际法在人员流动中的实施

      国际法在人员流动中的实施是一个复杂的过程,涉及多个国家和国际组织的参与。以下是一些实施国际法规范的重要途径:

      国际组织:联合国、国际移民组织等国际组织在实施国际法规范方面发挥着重要作用。它们通过制定政策、提供技术援助、开展国际合作等方式,推动各国遵守国际法规范。

      双边和多边条约:国家之间通过签订双边和多边条约,明确各自在人员流动问题上的权利和义务。这些条约有助于规范国家间的人员流动,保障个人和群体的合法权益。

      国内立法:各国通过国内立法,将国际法规范转化为国内法律,确保国际法在人员流动中的实施。国内立法是国际法实施的重要环节。

      4、国际法在人员流动中的争议解决

      在国际法框架下,人员流动问题可能会引发争议。以下是一些解决争议的重要途径:

      外交途径:国家之间通过外交途径解决人员流动争议,包括谈判、协商、调解等方式。外交途径是解决国际争议的传统方式。

      国际仲裁:国际仲裁是一种非司法的争议解决方式,由仲裁员组成的仲裁庭对争议进行裁决。国际仲裁在解决人员流动争议方面具有重要作用。

      国际法院:国际法院是联合国的主要司法机构,负责解决国家之间的法律争端。在国际法框架下,国际法院可以受理国家之间关于人员流动的争议案件。

      总结:本文以《International law and the movement of persons between states.pdf电子书版文档下载》为研究对象,从国际法视角出发,详细探讨了国家间人员流动的法律问题。文章分析了国际法在人员流动中的基本原则、规范、实施和争议解决等方面,揭示了国际法在人员流动中的重要作用。通过深入研究国际法在人员流动中的应用,有助于推动各国在人员流动问题上的合作与共赢。

      本文由nayona.cn整理

      点击联系需要东西方神秘学学习资料,专业的咨询

      只要网页介绍资料,全部都有,还有很多还没来得及更新
      每天更新200-300款资料
      全网最大最全的神秘学资料平台
      请需要什么资料,直接在对话框直接联系我,24小时在线,方便快捷
      请需要什么资料,直接在对话框直接联系我,24小时在线,方便快捷
      请需要什么资料,直接在对话框直接联系我,24小时在线,方便快捷
      有看中网站记得联系我
      图片2            

      联系我们

      图片2

      关注公众号

      打赏 微信扫一扫 微信扫一扫 支付宝扫一扫 支付宝扫一扫
      易学资料

      对占星塔罗感兴趣关注公众号